Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:07

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Are there any more 'nun' jokes?
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
6 million Chickens Dead and Counting - Daily Kos
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Nintendo Warns Switch 2 Owners Not to Remove Protective Screen Film - CNET
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
With a marketing degree, can I do a master’s in film production?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.